But it's not amazing meta-analysis with double blind methodology and 3000 subject. I had access to those mostly during my biomechanics classes at University. I'm not saying those are just common knowledge, there are studies pointing toward what I said.
Sources on this matter hard indeed scarce. Amongst other benefits, training for strength is much faster, and (in my very subjective experience) more psychologically rewarding. Strength work is also amazing for fat loss. You'll eventually do more regular PU if you train harder variations than if you simply increase PU volume. long runners), training strength is often better than training endurance regarding to endurance tasks. Small (3-8) sets for strength, bit longer ones for hypertrophy (10-12), but outside of specific extreme endurance training (e.g. > Ideal for hypertrophy? Strength? Power? Fat loss? Probably not endurance. Sidenote: why in the world is that site not allowing me to press the wheel to scroll by moving the cursor? All I can argue is that about nothing points to that being optimal but it's not my field so it gets complicated. Said gospel states that rest times above 90 seconds are way too much and that they should be preferably kept to 40 to 60 seconds. A friend of mine is a physical therapist and as such most of my friends who exercise follow her word as gospel. >My friend is a physical therapist and shocked me by saying almost nothing they do has been verified by double-blind trials. Would love a larger discussion about that but it isn't that popular to begin with. What I mean by that is not that conventional wisdom is right, but that the truth probably lies somewhere in there, frankly the state of things is one that I hate, I'd love to be able to just take an exercise plan tested and true, the most similar thing I've found is Julian's Shapiro workout plan which, from a google search, doesn't even have a good reputation in different fitness communities. Worth noting: for both of the studies cited the high end of reps for light weight is 25 while the low end for reps in heavy is 8, both well within "conventional wisdom". >There are multiple studies showing that lifting to exhaustion yields the same results regardless of the weight and number of reps This way she needs to walk backwards to put the weight back, which undesirable. The video shows the squatter in the opposite direction than in the description. The knees and ankles are very important, yet we get a single glance at her feet. A fixed camera that shows the entire body (and is possibly circling around the person) would be much better. It's hard to follow the movement with the camera moving up-and-down and zoomed in so much. Also for safety: instead of "until your thighs just break parallel with the ground", one shall not go deeper than their mobility allows (which might be above parallel). This can become extremely dangerous, and preventing injury should be the number 1 priority. No mention of proper tension in the upper body (and especially avoiding rounding in the lower back). "Pause for a moment at the bottom" is okay but unnecessary. Rather, make sure that your hip, knee and foot is in the same plane at all times. "Position your feet with an outwards 45-degree angle": the angle depends on the hip anatomy, and 45 degrees is very extreme. A couple points I'd change in the back squat tutorial (which was the first one I checked):
I like the initiative, but I wouldn't recommend these tutorials to my friends. They also do various outreach programs that of course require money to make happen. It's the content creators, who are fitness professionals spending their time not working for money that need to be supported by the funding. Some folks have called out perhaps not understanding the funding issues with hosting a site so minimal. If you're experienced in fitness, the site likely isn't for you. I hesitate to speak for them, but I don't think their mission is to provide content for people who already know what they want out of exercise, have been exercising for years, and understand what is and isn't good for their body. They also warm my heart with their hard stance on keeping the content free, having zero ads, and being accessible to anyone with internet access of any speed. Digestible, detailed, 30 day plans for beginners. I found the content to be exactly right for me at the time. When I was first starting any kind of fitness in my life, I went through several of the programs on darebee and read many of their guides.
0 kommentar(er)
